I attended the 10th
Kuala Lumpur Islamic Finance Forum otherwise known as KLIFF on 23rd September
2013 as representative from Bank Islam Malaysia Berhad as I sit in their
Shariah Advisory Council as a member. The first session was on a forum by top
Sharia scholar on Islamic banking and finance.
All of them are from the Middle East; Shaikh Nizam Yaqubi, Shaikh Abd
al-Rahim Sultan Olama, both are from UAE and Shaikh Esam Ishaq from Bahrain.
The session was chaired by none other Shaikh Dr. Daud Bakar, who is also
chairman of Bank Negara Shariah Council. The first round was opening remarks by
the panelists, started with Shaikh Nizam Yaqubi who stresses on importance of
having coordinating unit in the Islamic financial institution (IFIs)
functioning to harmonize different facets of the banking products (muntaj masrafi islami) which include
among others; the accounting, legal, central banking policy, taxation, international
standards such as BASEL II and so on. Example is given on the requirement of
Basel II in the case of bankruptcy of the financial institution offering sukuk, which parties should have the
preference, the investor or shareholder? Shaikh Abd al-Rahim Sultan Olama on
the other hand expresses concern on the declining Islamic value of IFIs, which
in his view must manifest as working towards achieving the objectives of the
Shariah. Whereas Shaikh Essam explaining criteria of a successful hub of an
Islamic institution with reference to the size of financial asset and
preparatory steps taken to develop and sustain the system. The most important
aspects are Shariah supervision, sound regulatory infrastructure and support
and commitment from the government. He
also elaborates Shaikh Sultan Olama points on the Shariah objective of the Islamic
finance where he is of the view that Islamic financial institution’s main
objectives of making profit appears to have eclipsed the Shariah objectives or maqasid. Nevertheless he defended IFIs
saying that the role to establish the maqasid
is the sole responsibility of IFIs. In order to achieve this all parties,
including the government and society should be involved. This is especially so
in respect of the government where assistance must be provided to IFIs through
the creation of new industries and capacity building of talented human capital.
The second round of the forum is the question and answer session. Among the
main issues discussed is yet again on the question of maqasid where it was suggested that IFIs should now focus in
introducing products based on musharakah
and mudarabah and reducing or
eliminating the use of debt based financial instruments such as murabahah and ‘inah. This suggestion was quickly dismissed by Shaikh Nizam Yaqubi
as a dangerous proposition that will make IFIs impractical and miss the point
that IFIs are only part of the larger players of Islamic economy. On the
question Shariah compliance, the same Shaikh lamenting on the possibility of
non-compliance of certain practices namely that of tawarruq. While the principle of tawarruq is permissible in Islamic law, where it must be transacted
by three independent parties, in practice the independence of these
transactions are questionable, since it no notable transfer of property is
involved. The issue of government support is again raised in order to ensure
that Islamic finance is the dominant players in the economy. Example given is
that government should guarantee the payment of sukuk, as incentive to the public to invest through sukuk. Without such a support Islamic
finance will continue to remain in the periphery of national and global
financial system. On the other technical issue raised is the question of
beneficial ownership or known in arabic as milkiyyah
manfa‘iyyah whether it can be used as a principal in any given transaction
of IFIs. The reply given to this issue is that such a concept although might be
novel to the fiqh tradition, it is acceptable and view with approval by most of
the Shariah bodies around the world. The concept drew its substance from
principle of common law of leasehold in mortgage transaction and from this it
is extended to the practice of Islamic finance. The panelists are of the view
that there are some English law principles that of assistance to Islamic
finance which now have been assimilated or adopted. One of the most salient is
the principle of trust that makes the issuance of sukuk possible. Because this principle is not known in the civil
law which is the basis for the commercial law in Arab countries, there has been
some issues on the introduction of sukuk.
There is no general conclusion to the forum, except discussion on matters that
are already known and at least still being debated among the scholars of
Islamic finance. However it is a good platform to Shariah scholars particularly
from Malaysia to interact and discuss with scholars from overseas.
Perspektif bertujuan memaparkan pandangan peribadi penulis terhadap pelbagai isu-isu semasa perundangan Islam bagi tujuan perbincangan dan perkongsian bersama. Perspektif is writer's view relating to contemporary issues in Islamic law for discussion and mutual sharing.
Sunday, 29 September 2013
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Kurang Kesedaran Pengguna Punca Peningkatan Sijil Halal Palsu?
Mengikut laporan akhbar pada 21/12/2024 kurangnya kesedaran pengguna antara punca peningkatan sijil halal palsu atau penyalahgunaan sijil be...
-
Yang dimaksudkan dengan sekuriti makanan ialah keadaan di mana terdapatnya bekalan makanan yang mencukupi secara tetap dan makanan tersebu...
-
12 Mei 2017 (Balai Ilmu, APIUM) Forum ini diwacanakan oleh gabungan tiga ahli panel terdiri dari ahli akademik, pengamal sukan diving ...
-
Kealpaan Membawa Padah: Tidak Patuh Syariah pada akad Bai ‘Inah dalam Kes FLH ICT Services & Anor v. Malaysian Debt Ventures Bhd [2016...